(214) 807-0414Request an assessmentArlington hail damage
After a hailstorm the question is how much of the roof is affected. In Arlington that is also the question the permit turns on, because the city's published threshold is ten percent of the roof surface. The extent of the damage, the extent of the scope and the permit position are one measurement — argued by three parties who each have a reason to prefer a different answer.
Check this address
What is different here
Three things that decide how a roof job goes in this city, and that are not the same one town over.
The carrier, the contractor and the city are all reading a proportion of the roof. Arlington's published guidance triggers a permit above ten percent of the surface, so a storm scope written in adjectives leaves the most consequential figure undefined.
A proportion needs a denominator. Establishing the total roof area, plane by plane, before the damaged area is described is what makes the ten percent line something to check rather than something to assert.
Photographs, dated weather context and a mapped area of affected roof record what is there. No contractor can tell you what a carrier will decide, and nothing here predicts a coverage result for any property.
Local context
Storm assessment often works from marked test areas on each slope. Those are a sample, and a sample has to be tied back to the roof it came from before it can support a proportion. A useful record says which slopes were examined, which were not, and why access or condition made the difference.
Storm work has a habit of expanding once a scope is agreed. In Arlington that expansion can cross the permit threshold, which means the paperwork position moves with it. Agree at the outset what happens to the permit if the area of work grows, and confirm the current requirement with the city.
Hail marks soft metals, vents, gutters and edge flashing as well as the covering, and those components are assessed and recorded separately rather than folded into the roof figure. Bundling gutters and vents into a single roof percentage muddles the one number the permit threshold actually depends on, and it makes the scope harder to check later.
Questions
Not directly. The city's published guidance turns on how much of the roof surface the work affects, not on what caused the damage. A storm scope large enough to cross that proportion carries the same requirement as any other work. Confirm the current rule.
No. A contractor documents visible construction conditions. The carrier decides coverage, and public adjusting is a separate licensed role. Anyone promising an outcome before anything has been inspected is describing a sales process, not an assessment.
It is far more useful than a description. A proportion of the total roof surface can be checked against the city's published threshold and against the photographs behind it. An adjective cannot be checked against anything.
In practice all three may produce a figure, and they will not always agree. A contractor measures to scope and to price. A carrier's representative measures to assess a loss. You can have the roof measured independently of both. In a city where a proportion of the roof surface decides the permit position, that disagreement is not academic. Ask each party what total roof area they used and how it was arrived at, and keep the photographs behind every number.
Assessment request
Short, routing-only questions. Nothing here asks you to diagnose the roof yourself.